Skip to content

hcde 516: More Indep Variables

16-Apr-10

Factorials
A factorial has more than one independent variable.
2 Independent variables (gender, education level) with 2 levels each (male, female) and (elementary, secondary). This creates 4 conditions. (Grid)

Mixed Factorial
At least 1 between-subjects IV and 1 within-subjects IV
Mixed design must deal with equivalent groups problems (between) and sequence effects problems (within).

After you collect your data
Check to make sure your statistical assumptions were met
Do you have normal distribution? (bell curve, skewness and curtosis)
Do you have homogeneity of variance? (Have one group vary alot, have another group not)
Are standard deviations similar across conditions?
If assumptions weren’t met, you have to use non-parametric statistics.

P Values
Significance (sig if over threshold, not sig if under)
95% confidence for social science (p , .05%)
The probability that chance will account for the difference less than 5% of the time.
P values are not about effect size. It is simply a threshold question.

Effect Size
Magnitude of difference
P value is a threshold
Effect size measure how big the effect is
For ANOVAs use Partial nsquared (partial eta squared)
“Proportion of total variation attributable to the factor, partialling out (excluding) other factors from the total non-error variation.”


hcde 516: within/between subject design

13-Apr-10

Within-subjects design
Manipulated variable
Participants get A + B

Advantages of Between-subjects:
“Gold standard” of experimental research
Allows isolation of one variable

Disadvantages of between-subjects
Need alot of subjects
Internal validity–Are differences due to the Independent Variable or differences between the two groups? (Equivalent groups)

Group Matching
Group based on some variable (with a predictable, measurable effect), then randomly assigned to one of the conditions.

Causality clarification
Empirical association
Appropriate time-order
Nonspuriousness

Bachman, The Practice of Resarch in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Chapter 5 “Causation and Research Design.”

Moderation
A does not cause C.
B does not cause C.
A + B causes C.  (The interaction has a moderating effect on the outcome.)

Mediation (Structural equation modelling.)

hcde 516: Planning and Designing

08-Apr-10

Randomization is a shorthand way to make groups equivalent.
The better the researcher understands the variables that “make a difference,”  randomization could be less valid rout to equivalence.

Stereoptype Validity Threat– Collect demographic data last.

Participant Effects
Demand characteristic means they act differently because they are in a study.
Hawthorne effect means they change behavior to be helpful to the researcher.

Experimenter Effects
Confirmation bias looks for confirmatory evidence.

Validity
Internal validity rules out other explanations of the results.
External validity relates to generalizability beyond the sample.
Ecological validity did the environment under which research is conducted generalize to other environments.

HCDE 516: Experimental Research Methods

30-Mar-10

Dr. Sarah Kriz,
kriz@u.washington.edu

Why research?
To describe
To predict
To understand

Research questions must be answerable, via current methods and technologies.
Type I Error: Conclude there is a difference when there is not. (Y, when N)
Type II Error: Conclude there is not a difference when there is. (N, when Y)

“Operational definition” defines a concept or category so that the concept can be clearly measured.

Citizen professionals and mass amateurization

06-Nov-09

Martin Wolske, from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Community Informatics Initiative.

Learning is lifelong, cyclical (reincarnation of Dewey)
Ask-Invesitgate-Create-Discuss-Reflect-Ask-on and on and on
Communities engage in this process too.

2009 Horizon Report identifies the trend of mass amateurization and grassroots scholarships. The quetion is not do they have technology? The question is do they have capacity? The focus should not be on diffusion of technology, but on social fabric.

Experiments with different configurations of computer labs and public access spaces.

Plastic technologies mold to use. You can pull it out or put it away. The average amount of time that a task takes in network-centric professions is 5 minutes. The needs of users are increasingly “plastic.”

Citizen professional toolkits:

  • easy to use
  • room for growth
  • sufficient production quality
  • portable
  • low cost

Citizen planners, citizen journalists, citizen research

Public computers should no longer be thought of as a stepping stone. Away from diffusion of technology to building social fabric.

Youth Community Informatics
Prairienet Community Network

Libraries 101

29-Oct-09

People have strong beliefs about “libraries.” There are true believers and skeptics. Our work at TASCHA, recently changed from CIS, has been thinking about libraries as mechanisms for community development, especially outside the US. We have been trying to step back and focus on what they DO and what FUNCTIONS they serve.

I understand libraries as incredibly valuable social spaces. I have witnessed generally welcoming spaces where people can read, get info and hang out, usually without being pestered to cough up dough. I have seen also seen libraries with far more wide ranging and radical visions. I have also seen sad libraries where people did not engage, for many different reasons. In the US libraries have played a key role in public information and lifelong education. Libraries fill an ecological niche that is unique, although their functions overlap with other “public” institutions such as NPR and public schools.Given the cost of technology and the importance of digital information, it’s worth it for our social, political and community well-being to think about how libraries can adapt to the changes induced by technology and our social behaviors.

Libraryman, a fierce, effervescent and energetic advocate for libraries, (and a bunch of crowdsourced allies) has been pushing the conversation on opportunities for libraries to adapt. Today he got a little love when BoingBoing picked up his video. I couldn’t look away:) Congrats Michael.

YouTube Preview Image

hcde 510: Lori Fisher, Director, IM User Tech

29-Oct-09

Lori’s domain is anything a user can see or touch.
“Positive information experience for customers.”
Drive faster adoption of IBM products…your job is not to be an artist, its to meet the deadlines and sell the products.
“Right content, right person, right time.”
“Proactive, embedded assistance in a progressive disclosure model. Providing less (at first) and then letting the user ask for more. If the user asks for help.”

Information developers (formerly known as technical communicators)  that work on the part of the product that communicates.

Writing for one context is “easy.” Writing simultaneously for audiences, formats, etc. is the new challenges.

Information model
Element model

Content Management Systems

Alternatives to the SEM…less radical alternatives than STOP and info mapping.

Modules, spreads, pouring of texts…

Weak modularity. Requires some contextual understanding.
Strong modularity. Standalone modularity.

HCDE 510: Challenges to the Standard Expository Model

27-Oct-09

Read Horn, “What Kinds of Writing Have a Future?
Weiss, “Bits, Atoms, and the Technical Writer: The Rhetoric of STOP.
Read Tracey, Rugh, and Starkey, Sequential Thematic Organization of Publications (STOP)

Storyboard model is modular, and therefor lends itself to modern digital content management. Information blocks are now reusable.
Pressure to produce more content on lager scales will increase demand for granularity.
Updates ripple outwards, e.g. change of facts changes to all the relevant places.
May not be creating documents, may be creating rules by which modules can be edited, mixed, remixed…meta writing. With xml the writing and the presentation are different. Creating reusable content is much easier across mediums v. genres. (Lori: XML scheme allows formatting to be appropriate…Weiss: Reusable information objects get reformatted improperly.)

Lots of similarities between STOP and powerpoint.

Categorical versus propositional headings. The linear, flow of the SEM, creates gravity for categorical. Topocentric nature of STOP forces propositional.

Audience changes and literacies have implications for move away from SEM. Changes in behavior, preferences, brain function…

HCDE 510: How Are Our Literacies Changing?

20-Oct-09

Robert Horn looked at the paragraph.
Tracy addresses the whole document.

STOP: 2 page spread (text, graphics)
If the format has to be a 2 page spread what do you do when you have more info? One example is fold outs. The foldouts, when converted to pdf, were lost. Supposedly digital loses the constraints, but the foldouts weren’t scanned!

Graphics Theory Category

  • Verbal Component
  • Pictorial
  • Schematic
  • Composite

Components

  • Signal icon
  • Title (may be descriptor)
  • Descriptor/Sub-descriptor
  • Tag line
  • Rating Element (comparative system)
  • Scale
  • Interpretive aid
  • Source
  • Other

Reader Reaction

  • Pre-attentive
  • Interpretive
  • Response

Type of Label

  • Endorsement
  • Comparative. (Symbol, rating scale)
  • Information Only
  • Hybrid

Decision infographics…any recommender system will fit into the patterns. “Consumer” in the broadest sense of the term.

How do you design for “readers” as culture and consciousness shifts? Media space rapidly changing. Digital, multimodal.
Industrial age: producers + consumers. Now: everybody is a producer.

Books of the print era need to be fat enough so that the title appears on the side.

HCDE 510: The Standard Expository Model

15-Oct-09

Elements:
Title
Comparative (Informational?)
Endorsement
Source
Tagline
Pictorial (symbolic icon, e.g. flame)
Continuous v. categorical scale

Context matters (low v. high) in how people interpret, what conclusions they will draw, etc.

Three levels:
Pre-attentive
Interpretation
Response

(Hot and cold) color spectrum crosses all culture.

Pay attention to all the copyright conversations: five pillars of fair use.

Pattern library projects should be in the domain of “Consumer Information Scorecards,” which includes, but is broader than Jared’s Environmental label.

87 patterns, 2 people doing each one.

Standard Expository Model

Microformat is something like: hanging indent, margins, fonts.
Macroformat is a set of microformats.

SEM has been so dominant for so long, there are very few competing alternatives. (information mapping, STOP,

Characteristics of Standard Expos Model (aka the linear, hierarchical model):
Display unit is negligible…text can be poured into many displays.
Intended to be read in a linear way.
Hierarchical, nested organizational structure.

Downward tendency…H1, H2, H3…you can always expand deeper.
Powerpoint forces you up to the top level with each new slide.

Michael Twyman

Chandler objects to the hypermasculine